Vyro vs Promote.fun: CPMs and campaign supply compared

Vyro advertises the higher rate; Promote.fun is easier to always have work on. Vyro is the MrBeast/ViewStats-backed marketplace that launched in October 2025 with a $3 CPM headline, though live listings are typically reported in the $1–2 range. Promote.fun is an open-signup campaign marketplace where published CPMs run roughly $0.20 to $2.25 per 1,000 views and the platform claims $400k+ paid to creators to date.

The real split is not the rate, it's the supply model. Vyro's campaigns are tied to its creator roster, so what's available fluctuates with which partners are running something that week. Promote.fun has no public vetting bar and a rolling catalog, so there's usually something open — but reviewers note the public campaign list skews toward crypto and memecoin launches, which is a different risk profile than a brand campaign backed by a recognizable name.

Vyro vs Promote.fun at a glance

Which one actually pays more per view?

On paper, Vyro. A $3 CPM against a $0.20–2.25 band is not close. But the number that matters is the one on the brief you can actually claim today, and there the gap narrows considerably: live Vyro listings are typically reported at $1–2, which lands on top of Promote.fun's upper half rather than triple it.

Run the arithmetic on a clip that does 250,000 views:

Rate	Earnings on 250k views
$0.20 CPM	$50
$1.00 CPM	$250
$2.00 CPM	$500
$3.00 CPM	$750

The spread inside Promote.fun's own catalog is wider than the gap between the two platforms. Picking the right campaign on Promote.fun matters more than picking the right platform. That is the general shape of this market — rate selection beats platform loyalty, which is why most consistent earners run clips against several marketplaces at once and let the briefs decide where the week's effort goes.

Campaign supply: fluctuating vs always-on

Vyro's structure means campaigns come and go with its roster. When a partner is running something, the brief has a real name attached and a budget behind it. When nothing's live in a niche you can edit for, there's nothing to claim — your workflow stalls through no fault of your own.

Promote.fun inverts that. Open sign-up and a rolling catalog mean supply is rarely the constraint. The constraint is quality: with no public vetting bar on either side, the campaign mix reportedly leans toward crypto and memecoin launches. Some of those are well-funded and pay exactly as briefed. Others are launch-week promotion for a token that may not exist in a month, which is a category where you want to read the payout terms carefully before you spend an evening editing. Our guide to clipping scams and red flags covers the specific things to check.

Tracking and verification

Both platforms track the same three short-form surfaces: TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. Neither tracks X (Twitter), so if X is part of your distribution, those views count for nothing on either one.

Neither platform publishes tracking internals in detail. That's normal in this category, but it means disputes over undercounted views come down to support responsiveness — and Promote.fun's Trustpilot profile, while solid at around 4 stars overall, carries a recurring thread of payment-processing and support complaints. Vyro is younger with less review volume; payouts are reported as real, but there's simply less history to judge from. If you want the mechanics of view verification generally, we broke them down in how clipping platforms verify views.

Where each one genuinely wins

Vyro wins on brief quality and headline rate. Campaigns attached to a recognizable creator ecosystem tend to come with better source footage, a clearer creative direction, and a budget that's actually funded. If you're optimizing for the highest rate per hour of editing, the $3 headline and the $1–2 live listings are the better end of this pair. The full breakdown is in our Vyro clipping review.

Promote.fun wins on availability and access. No vetting bar means you start today. A rolling catalog means you rarely wait. And if you're comfortable in the crypto niche, that's where industry CPMs run highest anyway — benchmarks put crypto and finance clipping at roughly $3–6 per 1,000 views against $0.50–2 for general entertainment, which is the whole argument for picking your niche deliberately. The Promote.fun review goes deeper on the catches.

How to choose

• Pick Vyro if you want fewer, better briefs, you're happy to wait for the right campaign, and you're editing content where a recognizable name attached to the brief makes the clip perform better.
• Pick Promote.fun if you need volume now, you're comfortable vetting campaigns yourself, and you'd rather have five mediocre options open than one good option that might not be live this week.
• Pick both if you're serious about this. Neither platform is exclusive, and the marginal cost of submitting the same clip factory's output to a second marketplace is close to zero.

Whichever you use, treat the published CPM as the start of the analysis, not the end. Read what triggers a rejection, when the budget is considered exhausted, and how quickly money moves from approved to withdrawn. Those three answers determine your actual hourly rate far more than the headline number.

The third option

Both platforms leave the same two questions open: when exactly does money land, and what comes out of it. Vues answers both explicitly — settlement is automated and fires when the campaign ends, with no manual payout step, and fees are lower than on competing platforms. The CPM is printed on the brief before you post, and the withdrawal processing fee is shown before you confirm.

It also tracks four platforms rather than three — TikTok, Instagram Reels, YouTube Shorts, and X — with no follower minimum to join. As of July 2026, $3M+ has been paid to clippers across 25.1B+ tracked views and 301,000+ approved clips, from 60+ funded brands. If you're already comparing these two, Vues vs Vyro is the direct head-to-head, and the live campaigns directory shows what's running right now.

Frequently asked questions

Does Vyro or Promote.fun pay more per 1,000 views?

Vyro advertises a $3 CPM and its live listings are typically reported at $1 to $2. Promote.fun campaigns run roughly $0.20 to $2.25 per 1,000 views. Vyro is generally the higher rate, but the spread inside Promote.fun's own catalog is wider than the gap between the two platforms.

Which platform has more campaigns available?

Promote.fun generally has more open at any moment because sign-up is open and the catalog rolls continuously. Vyro's campaigns are tied to its creator roster, so availability fluctuates depending on which partners are running something that week.

Do either of them track X (Twitter) views?

No. Both platforms track TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube only. If you post clips to X, those views do not count toward earnings on either platform.

Is Promote.fun legitimate?

It holds around 4 stars on Trustpilot and claims $400k+ paid to creators. Reviewers do report recurring payment-processing and support complaints, and note that the public campaign catalog skews toward crypto and memecoin launches, which is worth factoring into how you pick briefs.

Do I need followers to clip on either platform?

Neither publishes a follower minimum for clippers. Payment is per 1,000 tracked views, so what matters is whether the clip performs, not the size of the account that posted it.

Can I use both platforms at once?

Yes. Clipping marketplaces are not exclusive, and running the same editing workflow against several platforms is how most consistent earners handle the fluctuating campaign supply on any single one.